Comments on: Tupac, DDA Dog Gets to Go Home http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/735/tupac-dda-dog-gets-to-go-home/ the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:23:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Sarah http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/735/tupac-dda-dog-gets-to-go-home/#comment-20120 Sarah Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:26:49 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=735#comment-20120 My 17yr old deaf cat was killed by a lurcher and a staffordshire bull terrier outside my garden and the owner received a warning and was told to keep his dogs leashed in public. He still allows them off lead while walking around the streets so obviously doesnt give a toss. I agree, people need ownership tests. They should be questioned on situations like this. My old bull terriers hated small animals and were very very obedient, but, I would never allow them off lead in public where I knew they could easily bump into a cat or the likes as sometimes instinct comes before obedience. I am glad the dog was allowed home. Not his fault his owners were irresponsible. My 17yr old deaf cat was killed by a lurcher and a staffordshire bull terrier outside my garden and the owner received a warning and was told to keep his dogs leashed in public. He still allows them off lead while walking around the streets so obviously doesnt give a toss. I agree, people need ownership tests. They should be questioned on situations like this. My old bull terriers hated small animals and were very very obedient, but, I would never allow them off lead in public where I knew they could easily bump into a cat or the likes as sometimes instinct comes before obedience. I am glad the dog was allowed home. Not his fault his owners were irresponsible.

]]> By: Arthut Clinton http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/735/tupac-dda-dog-gets-to-go-home/#comment-20045 Arthut Clinton Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:01:43 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=735#comment-20045 Was this article written by former members of the soviet union propoganda and spin department? Great news that the dog is not having any kind of terminal action taken against it, but yet again an irresponsible dog owner emerges out of a court action as the victim! A cat is killed and this is glossed over in this article almost as an inconvenience! Male cow faeces regarding the 'quick thinking' of the defence solicitor, if the court imposes a disqualification of ownership on an irresponsible dog owner, what's the point of letting the guilty persons wife/partner being made the owner/keeper, it is blatantly obvious that the person will have access to the dog. Would they have sought this outcome for an animal abuser? All this case has done is basically let an irresponsible dog owner get off with having a PBT type dog that he knew chased cats and small animals, kill a cat and the slap on the wrist of 'notionally' being disqualified from having a dog is meaningless. Dog ownership tests now! Was this article written by former members of the soviet union propoganda and spin department?

Great news that the dog is not having any kind of terminal action taken against it, but yet again an irresponsible dog owner emerges out of a court action as the victim!

A cat is killed and this is glossed over in this article almost as an inconvenience!

Male cow faeces regarding the ‘quick thinking’ of the defence solicitor, if the court imposes a disqualification of ownership on an irresponsible dog owner, what’s the point of letting the guilty persons wife/partner being made the owner/keeper, it is blatantly obvious that the person will have access to the dog. Would they have sought this outcome for an animal abuser?

All this case has done is basically let an irresponsible dog owner get off with having a PBT type dog that he knew chased cats and small animals, kill a cat and the slap on the wrist of ‘notionally’ being disqualified from having a dog is meaningless.

Dog ownership tests now!

]]>