Pet Insurance Facts: Consider Dog Health Insurance For Peace Of Mind
March 16, 2010 – 3:27 pm | No Comment

When it comes to proper health care for your dog, nothing is more effective than taking preventive action. By learning some basic knowledge and adding a few simple measures into your daily routine, you can …

Read the full story »
Columns

Read the latest columns and view from the editor

Advice

From dog training to canine health, see our latest dog advice articles here

Articles

Read our latest dog articles and free editorial features

K9 Magazine

The latest content and features from K9 Magazine

News

The latest dog news from around the world

Home » All Content Channels

Woman Convicted for Murder Following Dog Mauling

Submitted by Freelance Writers on August 24, 2008 – 6:58 amNo Comment
---



Click to launch the full edition in a new window

In San Francisco a woman has had her original convinction for murder reinstated following a death caused by one of her dogs.

Marjorie Knoller, 53, sat quietly in the courtroom while Superior Court Judge Charlotte Woolard discounted her testimony at her 2002 trial and said Knoller had known her dog was potentially lethal when she took the animal out of her apartment without a muzzle.

The 140-pound Presa Canario, Bane, bolted away from Knoller and attacked Diane Whipple, 33, who bled to death from at least 77 wounds. The dog’s 100-pound mate, Hera, charged out of Knoller’s apartment and may have joined in the attack.

Trial judge believed her

But Superior Court Judge James Warren reduced Knoller’s conviction to involuntary manslaughter, saying he believed her when she testified she had no idea Bane might kill someone.

Knoller’s case wound up back in Superior Court after the state Supreme Court ruled last year that Warren had used the wrong legal standard in reducing Knoller’s conviction. The court said prosecutors seeking a murder conviction in a mauling case don’t have to prove the owner knew the dog was likely to kill

Despite Warren’s conclusion that Knoller hadn’t known Bane could kill, Woolard said, the evidence showed that she had known that both dogs “singularly or together were capable of killing a person and, if not properly restrained, would kill a person.”

Source – Read full story here


Should the UK introduce a law making dog owners stand trial for murder in cases where their irresponsible ownership has seen dogs take a human life?

Have your say.

Highly Recommended: What dog owner wouldn’t want a piece of THIS action?Get FREE dog food!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitthis

Related posts:

  1. World First: Dog is Called as Witness in Murder Trial
  2. Woman Accused of Killing Dog and Blaming Pit Bull Set for Court
  3. London Man Convicted of Dangerous Dogs Offences
  4. Woman Loses Arm in Dog Attack
  5. American Dog’s Life Spared – But Is This A Fate Worse Than Death?

Can we send you a free edition of K9 Magazine?

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.