Pet Insurance Facts: Consider Dog Health Insurance For Peace Of Mind
March 16, 2010 – 3:27 pm | No Comment

When it comes to proper health care for your dog, nothing is more effective than taking preventive action. By learning some basic knowledge and adding a few simple measures into your daily routine, you can …

Read the full story »
Columns

Read the latest columns and view from the editor

Advice

From dog training to canine health, see our latest dog advice articles here

Articles

Read our latest dog articles and free editorial features

K9 Magazine

The latest content and features from K9 Magazine

News

The latest dog news from around the world

Home » Uncategorized

Dangerous Dogs Act Prosecution Brought by Dog Warden

Submitted by Neil Burton on August 5, 2008 – 6:46 amOne Comment
---



Click to launch the full edition in a new window

A prosecution under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 brought by Three Rivers District Council Dog Warden Debra Sandling has resulted in a dog owner being fined, having to relinquish ownership of two Akita’s and being banned from owning dogs for five years.

Dog owner Mr Ahmed of King’s Langley in Hertfordshire was before the Magistrates Court on five charges of having dogs dangerously out of control. The two Akita dogs were allowed to stray on a regular basis. The dogs whilst straying had on four separate occasions attacked other dogs being walked by their owners on another occasion they attacked a person and they were seized by the council as stray dogs two hours after they had attacked another dog being walked by its owner.

In all the dogs had carried out seven attacks whilst they were straying and in all cases members of the public were intimated by the dogs,

The Magistrates found Mr Ahmed guilty on two counts of being the owner of dogs dangerously out of control in a public place, three other charges of were not proceeded with on Tuesday 5th August 2008.

He was fined £200 with £800 costs, has to relinquish ownership of the dogs and is disqualified from having custody of a dog for 5 years.

An interesting point to come out of the case was that although one of the dogs was micro chipped and the details on the microchip showed that Mr Ahmed was the dog owner, legal counsel was of the opinion that this was hearsay evidence and could not be used in court.

The Kennel Club were contacted and they were going to send an executive down from Petlog to confirm that Three Rivers DC had contacted them in the first place and that the information recorded was the same as the owner.

By prosecuting this case Three Rivers District Council has proven that it is not just the police who deal with dangerous dogs contrary to the recent DEFRA advice that advises that the police deal with dangerous dogs and that local councils deal with stray and nuisance dogs!

Highly Recommended: What dog owner wouldn’t want a piece of THIS action?Get FREE dog food!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitthis

Related posts:

  1. Dog Seized Under Dangerous Dogs Act is Returned to Joyful Owner
  2. The Dangerous Dogs Act: Costing Lives & a Whole Shed-Load of Cash!
  3. UK Dog Warden to Give Australian Presentation on Dangerous Dogs Laws
  4. Are the RSPCA Seizing Dogs Under Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act?
  5. Government Admits Dangerous Dogs Act Mistake

Can we send you a free edition of K9 Magazine?

One Comment »

  • Dave the Dog says:

    Well done the Dog Wardens! Good Job.
    As far as the Defra advice is concerned, I just wish our local Police would read it ! ! !

    Reply

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.