Comments on: Is the Montauk Monster a Dog? New Twist Emerges http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/ the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:23:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Pam Johns http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/#comment-18238 Pam Johns Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:13:37 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=648#comment-18238 Bailey, Google mountain lion skull and you will see what I am talking about. It appears the animal's upper teeth or fangs are missing but otherwise the images are the same. My husband has a picture of a mountain lion over our desk in our office where our computer is at. Also, this would explain the longer claws if it is/were a wild cat. Bailey,
Google mountain lion skull and you will see what I am talking about.
It appears the animal’s upper teeth or fangs are missing but otherwise the images are the same.
My husband has a picture of a mountain lion over our desk in our office where our computer is at.
Also, this would explain the longer claws if it is/were a wild cat.

]]> By: duhmcduhher http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/#comment-18234 duhmcduhher Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:16:32 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=648#comment-18234 Its a dog. A flat faced dog of some sort. Bulldog mix, boston terrier, something obviously flat faced.Its eyes are swollen closed if you zoom in. it has doggy ears. It could have a deformity where it didnt develop upper teeth or maybe the upper teeth fell out. Someone somewhere is missing their dog. The body "vanished" because the douchebags that found it love this publicity. Its gross and disgusting. Poor puppy doodles. Its a dog. A flat faced dog of some sort. Bulldog mix, boston terrier, something obviously flat faced.Its eyes are swollen closed if you zoom in. it has doggy ears. It could have a deformity where it didnt develop upper teeth or maybe the upper teeth fell out. Someone somewhere is missing their dog. The body “vanished” because the douchebags that found it love this publicity. Its gross and disgusting. Poor puppy doodles.

]]> By: Cheire D'Lyon http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/#comment-18224 Cheire D'Lyon Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:44:08 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=648#comment-18224 The body appears to be that of a muscular male dog. It was reportedly 2-1/2 to 3 feet long, and relatively young (teeth appear well developed). The overall body shape and position of the limbs are consistent with a canid, although the cartilage and some flesh is missing from the face, making it difficult to establish what breed. Also missing are the feet, although there is bone protruding from the front right forearm. (Not shown in this photo.) The remaining patches of fur, triangular ears, relatively long, whip-like tail strongly support my supposition. This unfortunate fellow was almost certainly a dog. The body appears to be that of a muscular male dog. It was reportedly 2-1/2 to 3 feet long, and relatively young (teeth appear well developed).

The overall body shape and position of the limbs are consistent with a canid, although the cartilage and some flesh is missing from the face, making it difficult to establish what breed. Also missing are the feet, although there is bone protruding from the front right forearm. (Not shown in this photo.)
The remaining patches of fur, triangular ears, relatively long, whip-like tail strongly support my supposition.

This unfortunate fellow was almost certainly a dog.

]]> By: cpaynter http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/#comment-18207 cpaynter Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:31:44 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=648#comment-18207 Where did this "new angle" come from? This doesn't look anything like the original photo and it's laying on the other side of its body. Its front feet are tucked into the sand and I don't see the piece of fabric that was tied around its front legs. It looks way more photoshoppy to me. Where did this “new angle” come from? This doesn’t look anything like the original photo and it’s laying on the other side of its body. Its front feet are tucked into the sand and I don’t see the piece of fabric that was tied around its front legs. It looks way more photoshoppy to me.

]]> By: Bailey http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/#comment-18200 Bailey Mon, 04 Aug 2008 15:41:00 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=648#comment-18200 Pam, No way is this a cat. It looks like something out of a cheesey scifi movie. And it's not a turtle either- what it IS we aren't being told yet. Pam, No way is this a cat. It looks like something out of a cheesey scifi movie. And it’s not a turtle either- what it IS we aren’t being told yet.

]]> By: Pam Johns http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/648/is-the-montauk-monster-a-dog-new-twist-emerges/#comment-18193 Pam Johns Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:11:10 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=648#comment-18193 Of course it is not a dog becauise it is more than likely feline... looks like a mountain lion or panther. Of course it is not a dog becauise it is more than likely feline… looks like a mountain lion or panther.

]]>