Now see, this a story I just don’t get.
If it is cultural acceptable to eat dog in China, why ‘suspend’ dog eating in accordance with a major sporting event being held in Beijing? Either eat dog or don’t eat, but to suspend the eating of dog? Seems odd to me.
Here’s the rub.
Beijing has asked hotels and restaurants in the city to take dog meat off the menu for the duration of next month’s Olympics and September’s Paralympics.
Dog is eaten not only by the large Korean community in China’s capital but is also popular in Yunnan and Guizhou restaurants.
A directive from the Beijing Food Safety Office issued last month ordered Olympic contractor hotels not to provide any dishes made with dog meat and said any canine material used in traditional medicated diets must be clearly labeled.
Concerned that canine dishes might offend animal rights groups and Western visitors, Beijing said restaurants expected to be popular among foreign visitors must stop serving dog meat “to respect the dining customs of different countries.”
The directive “advocated” that all restaurants serving dog suspend it during the Olympics but made no mention of the many popular establishments with donkey on the menu.
Criticism from Westerners caused the dog meat-loving South Koreans to ban canine dishes for a period of time during the 1988 Seoul Olympics.
What do you think?
Should we keep our noses out of other people’s dog eating cultures or should we exercise our own beliefs that dogs are not for the eating by simply withholding patronage of those countries that DO eat man’s best friend?
What difference does a ‘suspension’ of dog eating make to anything?
Highly Recommended: This could be the most important link you EVER click as far as your dog’s life is concerned – see why….!
Tags: Animal Welfare
its not the secies that bothers me, its the way their treated