Comments on: Public Consultation on Dangerous Dogs: Your Chance is Now – Dogs NEED You! http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/5141/public-consultation-on-dangerous-dogs-your-chance-is-now-dogs-need-you/ the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:23:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: sonia gregory http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/5141/public-consultation-on-dangerous-dogs-your-chance-is-now-dogs-need-you/#comment-118155 sonia gregory Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:45:56 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=5141#comment-118155 Any breed of dog anywhere in the world can be classed as dangerous when in fact most of the time it is the irresponsible owners that should be rounded up and caged. There are rogue dogs just like there are rogue human beings, but a particular breed of dog should not be held ultimately responsible for the sins of their owners. Any breed of dog anywhere in the world can be classed as dangerous when in fact most of the time it is the irresponsible owners that should be rounded up and caged. There are rogue dogs just like there are rogue human beings, but a particular breed of dog should not be held ultimately responsible for the sins of their owners.

]]> By: Felicity http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/5141/public-consultation-on-dangerous-dogs-your-chance-is-now-dogs-need-you/#comment-101446 Felicity Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:49:35 +0000 http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=5141#comment-101446 once again the goverment is barking up the wrong tree! do they serivously think that the people using dogs for weapons are going to turn round and insure their dogs. come on use some common. first no breed of dog is dangerous. dog owners make dogs dangerous, and the sonner we accept that the sooner we can repeal the dangerous dogs act 1991 and replace it with a non-breed specific effective laws. there's two types of people in this world that rase dangerous dogs, people that do so intentionaly and those that do so out of ignorance. if we had a dog owner suitability test than every single owner what have a mimimiun amount of noliege that that would atoumatically cut down on the number of people rasing dangerous dogs out of ignorance. second we need to have compulsory dog safety education in schools. 3rd compulsory micro chipping, not because it makes dogs safer because it doesn't, but it reduce the number of strays whoose owners can't be found. 4th harsher punishments for dog fighters and for thoose who use dogs as weapons. once again the goverment is barking up the wrong tree! do they serivously think that the people using dogs for weapons are going to turn round and insure their dogs. come on use some common.

first no breed of dog is dangerous. dog owners make dogs dangerous, and the sonner we accept that the sooner we can repeal the dangerous dogs act 1991 and replace it with a non-breed specific effective laws.

there’s two types of people in this world that rase dangerous dogs, people that do so intentionaly and those that do so out of ignorance. if we had a dog owner suitability test than every single owner what have a mimimiun amount of noliege that that would atoumatically cut down on the number of people rasing dangerous dogs out of ignorance.

second we need to have compulsory dog safety education in schools.

3rd compulsory micro chipping, not because it makes dogs safer because it doesn’t, but it reduce the number of strays whoose owners can’t be found.

4th harsher punishments for dog fighters and for thoose who use dogs as weapons.

]]>