<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is The Government Ignoring Dog Wardens Over Stray Dogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/481/why-is-the-government-ignoring-dog-wardens-over-stray-dogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/481/why-is-the-government-ignoring-dog-wardens-over-stray-dogs/</link>
	<description>by K9 Magazine, the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Holden</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/481/why-is-the-government-ignoring-dog-wardens-over-stray-dogs/#comment-6669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Holden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/481/why-is-the-government-ignoring-dog-wardens-over-stray-dogs/#comment-6669</guid>
		<description>Well said, both Neil and Cuthbert.
As Vice Chairman of the NDWA I would like to echo their comments. Responses to our views often take the view that we are being constantly negative to whatever is proposed. The answer simply is no, we are trying to put forward collectively, hundreds of years of experience from a nationwide perspective. As Neil rightly states, our views are apolitical and based purely on our roles and knowledge. The age of the simple 'dog catcher' (Knocknobbler) passed years ago and we pride ourselves on our knowledge experience and enthusiasm. We will keep on trying for ourselves, dogs and dog owners generally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, both Neil and Cuthbert.<br />
As Vice Chairman of the NDWA I would like to echo their comments. Responses to our views often take the view that we are being constantly negative to whatever is proposed. The answer simply is no, we are trying to put forward collectively, hundreds of years of experience from a nationwide perspective. As Neil rightly states, our views are apolitical and based purely on our roles and knowledge. The age of the simple &#8216;dog catcher&#8217; (Knocknobbler) passed years ago and we pride ourselves on our knowledge experience and enthusiasm. We will keep on trying for ourselves, dogs and dog owners generally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gnasher</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/481/why-is-the-government-ignoring-dog-wardens-over-stray-dogs/#comment-6665</link>
		<dc:creator>Gnasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/481/why-is-the-government-ignoring-dog-wardens-over-stray-dogs/#comment-6665</guid>
		<description>You would think that the civil servants who prepare laws for the government would at least speak to dog wardens about how they would think something would work if they brought it in!

I wonder why they do ignore the dog warden assoc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would think that the civil servants who prepare laws for the government would at least speak to dog wardens about how they would think something would work if they brought it in!</p>
<p>I wonder why they do ignore the dog warden assoc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
