<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSPCA Hits Back At Dangerous Dog Seizure Allegations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/462/coveted-animal-industry-award-goes-to-dogs-trust-director/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/462/coveted-animal-industry-award-goes-to-dogs-trust-director/</link>
	<description>by K9 Magazine, the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: still fighting for justice</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/462/coveted-animal-industry-award-goes-to-dogs-trust-director/#comment-7269</link>
		<dc:creator>still fighting for justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/462/coveted-animal-industry-award-goes-to-dogs-trust-director/#comment-7269</guid>
		<description>The owner is still fighting to get his dogs back, despite having already been sent to prison for owning them !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owner is still fighting to get his dogs back, despite having already been sent to prison for owning them !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/462/coveted-animal-industry-award-goes-to-dogs-trust-director/#comment-6637</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/462/coveted-animal-industry-award-goes-to-dogs-trust-director/#comment-6637</guid>
		<description>The RSPCA's comments on this hard-hitting release from the SHG are not very forthcoming.  Whether the RSPCA has convictions for perverting the course of justice - or a conviction for contempt of court for perverting the course of justice - does not matter to me.  The only judgements I've been able to find are not "nearly thirty years old".  The one in the Court of Appeal is just over 20 years old - typical RSPCA exaggeration, or is there perhaps another conviction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The RSPCA&#8217;s comments on this hard-hitting release from the SHG are not very forthcoming.  Whether the RSPCA has convictions for perverting the course of justice - or a conviction for contempt of court for perverting the course of justice - does not matter to me.  The only judgements I&#8217;ve been able to find are not &#8220;nearly thirty years old&#8221;.  The one in the Court of Appeal is just over 20 years old - typical RSPCA exaggeration, or is there perhaps another conviction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
