50 Great Tips To Give Your Dog A Longer, Healthier, Happier Life
February 1, 2010 – 10:42 am | 7 Comments

Dog Years. We all know the expression, most of us know the maths – 1 human year = 7 dog years (roughly). When you put it into a different context and say; ‘for every day …

Read the full story »
Columns

Read the latest columns and view from the editor

Advice

From dog training to canine health, see our latest dog advice articles here

Articles

Read our latest dog articles and free editorial features

K9 Magazine

The latest content and features from K9 Magazine

News

The latest dog news from around the world

Home » Pet Health News

BVA Speaks Out on Pedigree Dog Health Report

Submitted by BVA on November 3, 2009 – 9:28 amOne Comment
---



Click to launch the full edition in a new window

Vets have welcomed the recognition by a group of politicians that more must be done to tackle the health and welfare problems of pedigree dogs, but believe that non-pedigree dogs must not be overlooked and that puppy farming of both pedigree and non-pedigree dogs remains an enormous threat.

The British Veterinary Association (BVA) and British Small Animal Veterinary Association (BSAVA) both gave evidence to the Associate Parliamentary Group on Animal Welfare (APGAW) inquiry into the serious diseases and health problems suffered by pedigree dogs. The report ‘A Healthier Future for Pedigree Dogs’ is published today (Tuesday).

In particular the BVA and BSAVA welcome:

* Recognition that the veterinary role is vital in educating and informing dog owners, the breeding industry, and the public;
* The call for an independent advisory body made up of geneticists, veterinary surgeons, behaviouralists, breeders and animal welfare scientists to make recommendations to breed clubs through the Kennel Club;
* The recommendation for a database of diseases, accessible to all, to record disease incidence and allow a scientific, evidence-based approach to health and welfare;
* Support for increased use of health screening for known diseases and a legal requirement for screening of sires and dams for commercial breeding;
* The call for all registered dogs to be permanently identified, for example by microchip;
* The requirement for all stakeholders to work together [something the BVA Animal Welfare Foundation has already started working on];
* The call for more robust enforcement of the Kennel Club accredited breeder scheme and random inspections to ensure it stands up to scrutiny.
* The belief that it would be beneficial to use the long-awaited Code of Practice (under the Animal Welfare Act 2006) to encourage potential puppy owners to focus on the health and welfare of their chosen breed.

However, the BVA and BSAVA are concerned that the APGAW report does not identify how these initiatives will be funded, especially the financing of the proposed database, independent body and further genetic research. Nor does the report address the problems caused by puppy farming or provide any solution to protecting those dogs bred by hobbyists.

Commenting, Professor Bill Reilly, President of the BVA, said:

“The health and welfare problems associated with dog breeding are a major cause for concern amongst the veterinary profession. The APGAW report is therefore welcome and the profession will have much to consider and respond to in detail, even though these are just the first steps in the right direction.

“We are pleased that so much of the BVA and BSAVA’s evidence to the Group has been taken on board and we welcome the practical recommendations for a database, an independent body and the increased use of health screening. However, funding remains a major problem and we hope that Defra and the breed societies recognise the importance of financing these measures.

“Many of the changes will take time and money to implement but the BVA’s Animal Welfare Foundation has already brought together all of the stakeholders who are currently working on drawing up welfare principles and a puppy contract.

“The veterinary profession is committed to improving the health and welfare of all dogs, not just pedigree, and we are therefore disappointed that non-pedigree dogs have not been considered as part of this review. Inherited problems can affect all dogs and this must not be overlooked.”

Richard Dixon, President of the BSAVA, added:

“We see this area very much as a work in progress, but welcome the increased pace of change that the APGAW report is encouraging.

“We know that some breed clubs are already proactively taking steps to improve the welfare of their particular breed and the Kennel Club should publicly recognise this good practice to encourage all breed clubs and societies to take action.

“APGAW has recognised that vets and vet nurses have a key role to play in the education of the public and, specifically, prospective buyers. Vets are not simply there to deliver health care services to sick patients; we have a key role to play in disease prevention as well.

“Vets would also be a vital part of the proposed independent advisory body and the BVA and BSAVA are keen to ensure that there is a strong veterinary voice within this body.”

neo-winner

Highly Recommended: What dog owner wouldn’t want a piece of THIS action?Get FREE dog food!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitthis

Related posts:

  1. BVA to Collaborate on Bateson Review in to Pedigree Dog Health
  2. Pedigree Dogs Exposed Filmmaker Speaks About APGAW Report
  3. Pedigree Dog Health Report, The RSPCA Has Its Say
  4. Government Report in to Pedigree Dog Health a Slap in the Face for the Anti-Health Campaigners
  5. Government Report Highlights Serious Problems With Pedigree Dog Breeding

Can we send you a free edition of K9 Magazine?

One Comment »

  • Philippa says:

    If I could I would like to ask Richard Dixon to name the breed clubs that are being proactive and have actually secured meaningful health improvements for their breeds. Where exactly are the already existing role models?

    Does he not realise also that if we achieve better health reporting and recording for pedigree dogs we do likewise for the cross breed. This somewhat muted welcome of APGAW’s excellent report is disappointing but to be expected from these highly “political” veterinary bodies.

    Reply

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.