Pet Insurance Facts: Consider Dog Health Insurance For Peace Of Mind
March 16, 2010 – 3:27 pm | No Comment

When it comes to proper health care for your dog, nothing is more effective than taking preventive action. By learning some basic knowledge and adding a few simple measures into your daily routine, you can …

Read the full story »
Columns

Read the latest columns and view from the editor

Advice

From dog training to canine health, see our latest dog advice articles here

Articles

Read our latest dog articles and free editorial features

K9 Magazine

The latest content and features from K9 Magazine

News

The latest dog news from around the world

Home » All Content Channels

Is There Money to be Made from Breed Specific Legislation?

Submitted by Ryan O'Meara on February 24, 2008 – 10:38 amOne Comment
---



Click to launch the full edition in a new window

Our friends over at KC Dog Blog wonder aloud if the motivation for some breed specific legislation decisions could be motivated by a force more compelling than the safety of the general public.

Pointing to a recent move by legislators in Little Rock, Arkansas, who have unanimously decided to implement more restrictions on owners of Pitbull Terriers, that this decision may have been more motivated by a revenue generating opportunity than a dog/public safety one.

Based on the rules, ‘pit bull’ owners will now be required to take the following steps in order to keep their ‘pit bull’.  I’ve put some estimated costs for these items following the requirement:

Register the ‘pit bull’ — $150 (renewed annually).

Required sterilization — $100

Required microchipping — $35

Take photos of the owners and their pets every year.

So for a 1x cost of $285, plus $150 a year (per dog), someone can own up to two ‘pit bull’ type dogs.

READ THE FULL ITEM 

Highly Recommended: What dog owner wouldn’t want a piece of THIS action?Get FREE dog food!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitthis

Related posts:

  1. “Breed Specific Legislation Killed Our Dog”
  2. RSPCA Commended For Breed Specific Legislation Stance
  3. Another Council Recommends Breed Specific Legislation
  4. Exclusive: Major British Animal Charity in Breed Specific Legislation Controversy
  5. The Dangerous Dogs Act: It’s Time For Breed Specific Legislation To Go & Go Now

Can we send you a free edition of K9 Magazine?

One Comment »

  • Mac`s Gang says:

    I don`t imagine you`re really looking for a vote on that question but I`ll vote anyway….YES!
    It`s certainly not about Public Safety.
    Ontario,Canada has proven that.

    Reply

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.