Government Admits Dangerous Dogs Act Mistake
(just a shame they haven’t actually done anything to fix their error all these years on!)
Twelve years on and thousands of dogs later….
Today is a special day for anti BSL campaigners within England, Scotland and Wales as 12 years ago our government did something amazing. They held their hands up, said “We made a mistake” and took the first step towards correcting that mistake by amending the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, a piece of legislation that has cost thousands of innocent lives.
Prior to 8th June 1997 a dog branded “pit bull type” had to be killed regardless of how wonderful and friendly a pet the dog was or how responsible an owner. Any dog fitting the loose description of “type” died by lethal injection. After the 8th June 1997 however the courts were able to use their discretion when sentencing and could allow a dog that posed no danger to the public, to live. The dogs had to be entered onto the Index of Exempted Dogs and owners had to abide by strict restrictions but we no longer had mandatory destruction of dogs based on their physical appearance and the Dangerous Dogs Act (Amendment) 1997 came into force.
For those who stood against the mindless killing of pet dogs this was indeed a triumph, a rare occurrence of the Government admitting it had made a mistake. Sheer hard work, constant pressure and quite literally blood, sweat and tears brought about a change that would save some dogs from death by lethal injection.
I was originally going to write about what has happened since and take a look at what the future may hold but as I was nearly finished a picture came into my mind, a picture that illustrated what some have already been saying, the amendment is NOT enough.
The picture in my mind was of a dog called Oscar.
Oscar is a ghost, a dog that haunts me often. A beautiful red lad with a wonderful family who adored him. Oscar was a “wonky dog” who had been saved by a young lad who himself was very ill. He saw himself in Oscar and took him home as a young pup. Oscar and his new owner kept each other going until one day Oscar was seized. I spoke with Oscar’s family almost daily as they waited to go to court and win him back. They were so excited that he would be coming home but worried about his health problems and the care he would get in kennels. Messages regarding treatment was relayed to the Police and assurance’s it would be done given. Waiting for court was stressful as Oscar’s owner’s condition worsened and as court dates came and went without them, concerns arose.
There’s little point explaining all the ins and outs, you probably already know where it ended. For me the fight for Oscar ended with a phone call. A heartbroken screaming down the phone “they have killed him “. Over and over and over, heart wrenching sobs as the realisation they would never see Oscar, their “wonky dog” again, began to hit home. The police had logged Oscar incorrectly on their computer. He had been destroyed some time previously as a stray dog; his body had been disposed of. Oscar was gone.
We have the amendment but it didn’t save Oscar. We brought in the law, we brought in the amendment and we stopped bothering to change it anymore. Because of this Oscar died.
There are others like Oscar. There’s over a hundred that didn’t go home within the Met police alone recently. Seized and held in “secure kennels” with a “duty of care” to provide for those dogs, to protect them yet they failed. Some of the dogs that die in “police care” may not be “pit bull type” so if your reading this thinking your dog is safe, think again.
There’s hundreds being killed in rescue centres and pounds across the country. We have tried to gather figures on exact numbers killed in London but few seem to have any. We know its at least 100 in London alone over the last year, probably much more.
There are dogs being “identified” by people whose decision is going unchallenged, as owners don’t know where to turn, feel there is no alternative. Those dogs are dying too.
Dogs like Cassie. Her owners knew she wouldn’t cope with being away from her family. They cuddled her weeping as her life ebbed away.
There are dogs like Barney and Missey. Seized and registered but the confines of “secure kennels” has had its affect on them and they are unable to settle back into family life. Barney’s owner rang me after he let Barney go.
“ We never really win do we?” he asked and we don’t. The dogs don’t win and neither does the public. Everybody loses and the dogs are still dying even with the amendment.
These ghosts are a mere drop in the ocean of lost souls. These are some of the ones we know of, some of the ones we hoped to save. For each dog we know of you can be sure another dog at least has also lost its life.
It’s been twelve years since the Government gave limited discretion to the courts allowing some dogs to live. Twelve years since any change was made to the worst piece of legislation this country has known. We are offered our medication to accept this by way of “Leave at home” policies but while we may cheer and pat ourselves on the backs this offers little for the dogs. Do you intend to wait another 12 years before Section one of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is repealed for good?
http://ddawatch.webs.com/index.htm
Say No to Breed Specific Legislation
Highly Recommended: What dog owner wouldn’t want a piece of THIS action? – Get FREE dog food!
Related posts:
- Another Dangerous Dogs Act Canine Welfare Scandal: Dogs Continue to Die in “Police Care”
- MPs Line Up to Call For Dangerous Dogs Act Review
- Are the RSPCA Seizing Dogs Under Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act?
- Dog Seized Under Dangerous Dogs Act is Returned to Joyful Owner
- Bateson Report Calls for Dangerous Dogs Act Reform







The only was to fix it is to repeal it.
Reply
You have to understand British politicians are far too busy protecting Criminals(remember they vote) and of course of late covering their own tracks.The whole bunch should be removed and replaced by decent human beings,which hopefully we will see in the USA with the arrival of President Barack Obama whom I do rate as a Decrnt Human Being..
BSL will be Destroyed in the States.
Reply
I hope BSL is destroyed in the States and everywhere else too.
Reply
I totally agree. Appeal section1 and get rid of BSL for good.
Reply
One day people will look back at the dangerous dogs act and talk about back in the day when we actually killed dogs for fitting some look and how it went on for years. 12 years since any move to change it, what a sad state of affairs.
Reply
The dangerous dog act is quite frankly stupid. I think that it encourages more people to want to own a pit bull or other banned breeds, simply because they know that they are banned. Where i live in the UK I see pitbulls everyday. infact there is a few living in my road and probably hundreds around my area. Mainly owned by boy teens. Its such a shame as when i have been in america, i have met some lovely pits and considered owning one before the ban. There still is nothing stopping me from purchasing a ‘pit’ type breed, infact i simply could contact a breeder and purchase one for as little as a hundred pound, as i was offered one the other day by a mate. I think it is such a shame of the ban, as given the proper owner and love, pitbulls will make such a lovely dog. I just hope the list of dangerous dogs will not ruin more breeds in the future.
Reply
I know I’m posting this late in terms of everybody elses posts, but I felt compelled to write this!
Why? Why? Why? Is it ALWAYS the dog at fault?
I have never ever been able to understand that. An animal [regardless of breed] is born without a preconsception of it’s responsibilities. WE teach them EVERYTHING in captivity, in the wild their parents are responsible!
So surely ‘Dangerous Dog’ is not quite right. The owner has taught the dog dangerous behaviour, it might be born with some instinct due to its breed but training either brings that instinct to the fore or teaches the dog control [in any situation].
You only have to look at Guard Dogs to know that’s true. Police dogs are expertly trained to hone their instinct as attack animals/search animals/sniffer animals and only ever act on that instinct when instructed to do so by their handler.
There is absolutely NO reason why any breed can not be trained in the same way, so you have a safe, obedient companion.
The dog can never always be 100% at fault either, a tethered dog in a garden is going to be ‘on guard’ whether told to be or not! If you enter its space without announcing your intentions expect to get barked at, lunged at, or even worse, bitten! That’s YOUR fault, not the dogs! This is especially the case when the property does not belong to you and you approach the dog without the dogs owner[s] in sight.
So STUPIDITY is more responsible for 90% of dog attacks we see in this country or any other for that matter.
Obviously I like dogs, but then I like most animals if I’m honest, they accept you for what you are after all and have no expectations. Regardless of liking them or not, if I particularly liked a dog and wanted to get closer, I would say a friendly hello to the dog to show I was not a threat, then I would sure as hell seek the owner out first and ask if it was ok to touch their dog, is he safe if I move to his level, how does he react to strangers etc. etc. BEFORE I went near the dog itself. Isn’t that common sense or am I expecting too much?
If you rush at dog regardless of how cute to goo and gah at it, you are in danger of getting hurt! How would you like it if a perfect stranger rushed up to you in the street and started heavily patting you on the head? I know I’d knock their lights out!
Anyway, I think I’ve made my point. When treated with kindness, gentleness and respect, a dog will respond to you in the same manner.
Reply