By: Gary Blain

Gary Blain — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:31:05 +0000

It is not good when a Council`s Regulatory Officers on an other from these Humane Society and Walfare Groups with no former training in Police dogs can charge a Security Officer with an offence under Queensland`s Domestic and Dangerous Dog Regulations, after a Police investigation and a Court Decision where the person was responsible for her own actions and safety.
Councils are still allowed to put a Dangerous Tag on a Security Dog, because the bite was evident and still are allowed to destroy a person $60,000 dog.
On a Certified a Police Dog Handler under Australia`s National Quality Training Framwork, Security Licensed Dog Handler, Classified for the Security Industry of Australia, as a Registered Accredited Auditor Assessor and Instructor.
Council`s have very little Authority to destroy any dog that bites specially a dog trained under Australia`s Correctional Services, all this talk becomes a little bit ridiclous when Queensland`s Local Government and their Regulatory Officer can destroy any dog that bites using its outdated Domestic and Dangerous Dog Regulations, still can override Australia`s National Taining Authority without any former training.
They have no International standards or is there ever written for the Security Industry`s Working Dog of Australia nor do they supply certified instructor from our Correctional Services or Security Providers to monitor Queensland`s Registered Training Organisations.
It has got me gobsmack! why people with little Authority are allowed to make these rules and regulations for others who have been professionally trained within the law on Security Working dogs.
I know! as it happened to me, has been on going for the last seven years to Nature of my business of 10 years to to the above.
Where you can only operate in the above on the approval of Queensland`s Council Authority, who are not a RTO to do so.

Comments on: American Humane Society ‘Pleased’ at Michael Vick Dog Fighting Prison Term

By: Gary Blain