<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kennel Club&#8217;s Decision to Ban Incest: Just a PR Stunt?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1911/kennel-clubs-decision-to-ban-incest-just-a-pr-stunt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1911/kennel-clubs-decision-to-ban-incest-just-a-pr-stunt/</link>
	<description>the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doodlebug</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1911/kennel-clubs-decision-to-ban-incest-just-a-pr-stunt/#comment-31006</link>
		<dc:creator>doodlebug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=1911#comment-31006</guid>
		<description>Whilst i see where you are going with this, i also see where the Kennel Club stand (not that i fully agree with either of you!) I run dog training classes and in my area we have a huge increase in labradoodles and cockerpoos (bought at extortionate prices!) more than &#039;an offchance&#039; of the labradoodles are displaying signs  of  HD and have to be guided to go to the vets for a check up , ususally followed by xray and confirmation of HD whilst to my knowledge 4 of the cockerpoos have (probably genetic) eye problems, this is in only a small dog training club, how many more are out there?, surely they don&#039;t all turn up only to my classes!!! so in a way the KC is right, all breeders should breed responsibly not just the KC registered breeders, what about getting on the case of these people who breed the &#039;designer&#039; type dogs for huge amounts of money without doing the relevant health tests? or the people who try to breed the most unsuitable crosses, ie the &#039;Dollie&#039;  - dalmation x collie, a nightmare cross for most &#039;normal&#039; housholds, these are total outcrosses that still have the health problems, non of which have anything to do with the KC or registration policies </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst i see where you are going with this, i also see where the Kennel Club stand (not that i fully agree with either of you!) I run dog training classes and in my area we have a huge increase in labradoodles and cockerpoos (bought at extortionate prices!) more than &#039;an offchance&#039; of the labradoodles are displaying signs  of  HD and have to be guided to go to the vets for a check up , ususally followed by xray and confirmation of HD whilst to my knowledge 4 of the cockerpoos have (probably genetic) eye problems, this is in only a small dog training club, how many more are out there?, surely they don&#039;t all turn up only to my classes!!! so in a way the KC is right, all breeders should breed responsibly not just the KC registered breeders, what about getting on the case of these people who breed the &#039;designer&#039; type dogs for huge amounts of money without doing the relevant health tests? or the people who try to breed the most unsuitable crosses, ie the &#039;Dollie&#039;  &#8211; dalmation x collie, a nightmare cross for most &#039;normal&#039; housholds, these are total outcrosses that still have the health problems, non of which have anything to do with the KC or registration policies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dogmagazine.net @ 2012-02-10 02:37:31 -->
