<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camden Council Introduces Dog Control Orders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/169/camden-council-introduces-dog-control-orders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/169/camden-council-introduces-dog-control-orders/</link>
	<description>by K9 Magazine, the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Electric Collars are Not The Biggest Issue Facing Canine Welfare Today</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/169/camden-council-introduces-dog-control-orders/#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Collars are Not The Biggest Issue Facing Canine Welfare Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/camden-council-introduces-dog-control-orders/#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>[...] when they now proudly tub-thump about how shockingly ill conceived the legislation is? Why do they use PR to try and spin dog lovers into believing they are doing more than they are on this most serious of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when they now proudly tub-thump about how shockingly ill conceived the legislation is? Why do they use PR to try and spin dog lovers into believing they are doing more than they are on this most serious of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertie</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/169/camden-council-introduces-dog-control-orders/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/camden-council-introduces-dog-control-orders/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>As usual the Kennel Club pipes up that it has helped in this case Camden Council to form reasonable dog control orders?  Since when has the Kennel club had any statutory invovlement with Local Authorities?  This is spin of the worse kind by an elitist organisation that on the one hand criticises local authorities and spreads the word that one may have dared to want to improve local environmental quality for the benefit of all residents by bringing in orders but on the other hand 'helps' to set up dog control orders?  Who is helped, the irresponsible dog owners who think it is okay to let their dogs wander and foul across sports pitches, kids playgrounds and other places that it may be wise to not take dogs or all the residents of an area?  Hopefully the Kennel Club 'fought' for all dogs and their owners, not just the pedigree ones?  Wonder what dog related issue the KC, Dogs Trust, RSPCA and the Blue Cross will next waste money on trying to duplicate the same response for?  How about using your public donations (animal charities) to help animals and the KC to sort out the dodgy breeders who are quick to mention that the litters they sell are KC registered than mess around with legislation thaty ou all had the opportunity to comment against when it was being put together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual the Kennel Club pipes up that it has helped in this case Camden Council to form reasonable dog control orders?  Since when has the Kennel club had any statutory invovlement with Local Authorities?  This is spin of the worse kind by an elitist organisation that on the one hand criticises local authorities and spreads the word that one may have dared to want to improve local environmental quality for the benefit of all residents by bringing in orders but on the other hand &#8216;helps&#8217; to set up dog control orders?  Who is helped, the irresponsible dog owners who think it is okay to let their dogs wander and foul across sports pitches, kids playgrounds and other places that it may be wise to not take dogs or all the residents of an area?  Hopefully the Kennel Club &#8216;fought&#8217; for all dogs and their owners, not just the pedigree ones?  Wonder what dog related issue the KC, Dogs Trust, RSPCA and the Blue Cross will next waste money on trying to duplicate the same response for?  How about using your public donations (animal charities) to help animals and the KC to sort out the dodgy breeders who are quick to mention that the litters they sell are KC registered than mess around with legislation thaty ou all had the opportunity to comment against when it was being put together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
