<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Competition: Which Country Can Write the Worst Dangerous Dog Laws?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1595/new-competition-which-country-can-write-the-worst-dangerous-dog-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1595/new-competition-which-country-can-write-the-worst-dangerous-dog-laws/</link>
	<description>the lifestyle magazine for dog lovers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:23:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lilburne</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1595/new-competition-which-country-can-write-the-worst-dangerous-dog-laws/#comment-27681</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lilburne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=1595#comment-27681</guid>
		<description>PART TWO 
 
Fancy getting a Liberal Democrat Lord to put the Private Members Bill through the House of Lords for the proposed Dog Control Bill, what maniac thought that by bringing this in they could scrap the Dogs Act 1871, this act has always enabled a control order to be brought on a lesser degree of evidence that would be benefical to public safety and ultimately to the dog. 
 
With the Scottish legislation, I was stunned to see that a major charitiy had carried out a soviet style coup and taken the thoughts of Mr Cuthbert Jackson and reinvented them as their own, if they cannot even give credit where it is due, what hope for openess and democracy? 
 
Sadly it is now confirmed that the lunatics have taken over the asylum!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PART TWO </p>
<p>Fancy getting a Liberal Democrat Lord to put the Private Members Bill through the House of Lords for the proposed Dog Control Bill, what maniac thought that by bringing this in they could scrap the Dogs Act 1871, this act has always enabled a control order to be brought on a lesser degree of evidence that would be benefical to public safety and ultimately to the dog. </p>
<p>With the Scottish legislation, I was stunned to see that a major charitiy had carried out a soviet style coup and taken the thoughts of Mr Cuthbert Jackson and reinvented them as their own, if they cannot even give credit where it is due, what hope for openess and democracy? </p>
<p>Sadly it is now confirmed that the lunatics have taken over the asylum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lilburne</title>
		<link>http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/1595/new-competition-which-country-can-write-the-worst-dangerous-dog-laws/#comment-27680</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lilburne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dogmagazine.net/?p=1595#comment-27680</guid>
		<description>I would hazard a guess at the result being a draw as the legislators from both sides (England &amp; Wales) and Scotland use the same &#039;advisors&#039;, namely organisations and animal charities that do not have to work at the sharp end of animal control.  Although the RSPCA/SSPCA deal with animal cruelty etc, they do not deal with stray dog enforcement, dog fouling enforcement or taking people to court because their dog(s) have attacked somebody. 
 
Due to the fact that numbskull advisors are working behind the scenes on both pieces of legislation, it will certainly be a no-score draw as in there will most certainly be no winners anywhere. 
 
PART TWO FOLLOWS </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hazard a guess at the result being a draw as the legislators from both sides (England &amp; Wales) and Scotland use the same &#039;advisors&#039;, namely organisations and animal charities that do not have to work at the sharp end of animal control.  Although the RSPCA/SSPCA deal with animal cruelty etc, they do not deal with stray dog enforcement, dog fouling enforcement or taking people to court because their dog(s) have attacked somebody. </p>
<p>Due to the fact that numbskull advisors are working behind the scenes on both pieces of legislation, it will certainly be a no-score draw as in there will most certainly be no winners anywhere. </p>
<p>PART TWO FOLLOWS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.dogmagazine.net @ 2012-02-10 08:15:03 -->
