Imagine it.
Any day now, this is the headline you could be reading.
Of course, the alternative headline: The BBC Will Not Continue to Broadcast Crufts is also a possibility – as it stands the BBC is currently in the review process but as we know, Crufts is coming round in March and a decision will need to be reached very soon.
So I thought it would be a good opportunity to examine what has changed since Pedigree Dogs Exposed – the documentary which has prompted the BBC to review its status as Crufts broadcaster – was aired.
First off we have to examine the reasons why Pedigree Dogs Exposed was so hard hitting.
All who watched it will recall the Cavaliers in agony. They will recall the frankly shocking views of some of the breeders – for instance the Ridgeback breeder who was fretting that she had to deploy the services of an ‘old retired vet’ to kill her healthy, albeit ridgeless, puppies. We’ll recall the shock and outrage of the exhibitor who not only continued to show her Cavalier King Charles Spaniel dog, despite him being a carrier of the deadly Syringomyelia, but also used him liberally as a stud. The documentary showed the chairman of the Kennel Club objecting that he: “Did not need a bunch of scientists telling me about my dogs”. Put it this way, there was enough material contained within the documentary to cause a fallout that is still rippling.
So compelling was the footage, the RSPCA withdrew from Crufts. They have since been followed by The Dogs Trust, The NDWA and The PDSA. Crufts also lost its main sponsor in a decision that was cited as being commercial and not specifically liked to the documentary.
For its part the Kennel Club have: pre-warned that the documentary was biased, objected that ‘only’ 10% of pedigree dogs have health problems, complained to broadcast regulator OFCOM and then, after much gnashing of teeth, agreed that the public reaction had been listened to and hastily agreed to review the breed standards of every KC recognised breed.
But one or two other little incidents have also cropped up between then and now.
Margaret Carter, the lady who spoke out about Cavalier health in the documentary, was kicked off the committee of the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel club for ‘breaching confidentiality’. The Kennel Club, to the shock and surprise of the Cavalier club, came down in firm support of Margaret. And then, to the shock and surprise of anyone who has a shred of understanding as to what the word ’support’ actually means, came out to express their total support for the Cavalier club!
The BBC meanwhile have kept silent. They have constantly refused to answer questions about who it is that is advising them on the future of Crufts, what their qualifications are, what their backgrounds are, whether they have any links to the dog world or – more pertinently – the dog show world. This is highly unusual. Why would the BBC, a public funded body, feel it had the right to operate under a cloak of secrecy? Surely if it wants the public to accept its final decision on whether to continue to air Crufts with respect, it should be utterly transparent about what model it is using to assess the suitability of Crufts in its current form?
Put it this way, the RSPCA have shown no signs of giving Crufts a clean bill of health – and this is an organisation that deals, explicitly with animal welfare issues. The PDSA is even more interesting. This is an organisation that has a network of veterinary practices and who have recently come out publicly to declare that they do NOT accept the Kennel Club’s own claim that ’90% of all pedigree dogs are healthy’. Even more pertinent, the PDSA did not jump ship straight away. They waited to see what was happening. They took the time to obseve the Kennel Club’s strategy for improving dog health. They waited and THEN they withdrew. Read in to that what you will.
So now, let us imagine the headline of this feature is what you read tomorrow: The BBC Will Continue to Broadcast Crufts, how will you view that decision?
Does the BBC know more than the UK’s leading veterinary charity? Do they know more than the UK’s leading animal welfare charity? Do they know more than the UK’s leading dog charity? Do they know more than the UK’s leading dog warden association? Who knows! Because we’ve not been told who is actually advising them. A freedom of information request has been submitted to the corporation but still, no word.
Let us not forget the words of the Kennel Club’s own secretary Caroline Kisko who described the position of the BBC in relation to their continued broadcast of Crufts as “untenable”. Strong stuff.
So which way do you think it will go?
Could the largest publicly funded broadcaster in the world be about to make a Jonathan Ross / Russel Brand sized error of judgement?
Could the Beeb be on the verge of completely misjudging the mood of the public once again?
Or could they be about to follow the lead set by the more highly qualified, experienced professionals from the RSPCA, Dogs Trust, PDSA et al?
Surely the BBC wouldn’t seek to pretend it ‘knew better’ than the UK’s most prominent animal welfare and veterinary charities? Could they?
No doubt we’ll soon find out.
Highly Recommended: This could be the most important link you EVER click as far as your dog’s life is concerned – see why….!
As a licence fee payer I will be disgusted if they carry on showing Crufts. It would not be my decision and I feel as a licence fee payer, the general opinion should carry and that opinion surely would be that people think the KC should get their house and breeds in order before being given the benefit of this, its not just a ticking off that's needed to sort the problem out, a weakened sorry from the KC and an ok we'll carry on, this is a bigger issue.
Please BBC, take a stand and make a difference. Pull Crufts until things are right, not on the promise things are being done.
As a license fee payer I think the BBC ought to be taken to task for showing such a biased and badly edited documentary as Pedigree Dogs Exposed. Hopefully they will be as soon as the results of the Ofcom complaint by the Kennel Club is published. As a licence fee payer I think that the Kennel Club ought to tell the BBC to go and take a hike and give the rights to show Crufts to a TV station which will show more of the competition and less of pampered "C" list celebreties.
Whatever the BBC do or do not decide, that it is the author of this article who is the one who has completely misjudged the mood of the public. The public showed exactly whose side they were on at at Discover Dogs – entries were up on last year. Looks to me like the public can see through all the media hype such as the article above and are supporting the Kennel Club.
Val, you might want to try getting in to the real world if you think attendance figures for an event such as Discover Dogs are a means by which to judge the public mood. People are sick to death of apologists with vested interests ignoring the very basic, plain facts that there are sick dogs bred as a result of Kennel Club endorsed breed standards. The public does NOT share the view that this is OK or that this is 'hype'. And I'll tell you another thing, the BBC won't be showing 'more of the competition', some people think dog shows are like watching paint dry (http://www.dogmagazine.net/archives/359/kennel-cl…- not my words.
I agree that the BBC should not be running Crufts, although our reasons are widely different.
There are 7 million dog owners in this country. 7 million people did not turn up to Discover Dogs. You are clearly someone who is on the side of the KC, I think therefore you are possibly within that world and therefore not best placed to judge the overall mood of the general dog owner as the people you most likely speak with regularly are within the same world as you.
General dog owners/lovers are still outraged at what this show turned up – the attitude of those breeders/judges involved in the show and the state of dogs health in this country.
Val, what part of investigative journalism do you not get? PDE investigated dogs and the BBC decided to schedule it for 9pm. The programme makers did not make it, then ring the BBC and say 'put this on at 9pm', if they had thought there was nothing to the programme they would have probably put it on at 11.30pm or on BBC3.
As an ordinary person in the street who is a dog owner and a BBC licence payer, I am glad that PDE was 'aired'. If there was nothing to hide about pedigree dogs, Ms Harrison would not have found anything to shock the nation with would she?
The BBC needs to make it's mind up re broadcasting as the Kennel Club with it's 'untenable' comment seem to have obviously got Crufts lined up for another channel!
What has really been exposed here is the totally complacent attitude of the self proclaimed leading organisation for dogs in the UK, which they obviously do not like one bit.
Who made them the leading organisation, they do not represent me or my dog?
Ryan, I do live in the real world. I am talking about a real event hosted by the Kennel Club, where real people paid real money to come to the event and support both the Kennel Club and the all the many charities who, incidentally, benefitted greatly from the absence of the RSPCA , the Dog's Trust, and the PDSA. Real people, Ryan, not projections of your own supposition. Perhaps if you had been there and seen all the excellent, happy and healthy specimends of both pedigree and mongrel dogs for yourself, had seen all the breeders and owners discussing their breeds with the members of the public, had actually spoken to the members of the public instead of merely supposing that everyone shares your point of view, then you too would be in a better position to judge the mood of the public.
I am a great supporter of the work you do with DDAWatch, and I fully support your call for the licensing and training of dog owners, but I feel that your failure to recognise all the good work the Kennel Club do is unworthy of you. With so many issues surrounding dogs and their welfare that need crusaders to fight for them, it seems stupid to me to be wasting time fighting an organisation that truly cares for the welfare of dogs.
Val: As a dog show insider, I can tell you that that the essential criticism in the BBC video is something some of us have been very concerned about for a long time, and have been greatly disturbed about the lack of more than lip service to breed health issues by most of the dog show power structure. Rather than criticizing the editing or calling the documentary biased, you should be asking if the criticism is valid. I applaud Jemima. It takes a bit of toughness to get people's attention.
Val, does the Kennel Club truly care for the welfare of dogs?
If it did then there would be no Pedigree Dogs Exposed or people being critical of the Kennel Club would there?
What is happening here is that people have become fed up with the self rightous, we know best attitude of the Kennel Club, great, they are something to do with dogs, but nothing to do with my dog, or other ordinary people in the street.
They are essentially a breed register that has had the ear of the establishment for nearly 100 years, now though times have changed if the KC think they represent all things dog in the UK they really are ‘barking’ up the wrong tree!
Sorry Val, they may do some good things, but on the other hand they have no remit with something but yet interefere, how come they do not interefere more on puppy farming and breed standards for the welfare of dogs, pedigree or otherwise?
Thank the stars that there are people out there willing to expose issues, if the KC had put it’s hands up straight away and acted a bit more professionally on the TV where we all saw them in action, or we listened to their counter attacks on the radio where they came over as unrepentent, things might be different and with some damage limitation everyone would probably have forgotten Pedigree Dogs Exposed.
Because the KC continues it’s arrogant attitude towards those who dare to be critical of it or highlight issues about it, it will never have the respect it should have.
Loved the article in the Guardian where it said that a sign in the KC members dining room was concerned about the dress code of people eating there, what about being a bit more concerned about the breed standards instead?
The Kennel Club for all it’s hospitality and lobbying needs to be aware that there are several other organisations fighting for a better deal for dogs that do not have the stuffed shirt approach of the Kennel Club out there now.
Hoorah! The BBC have done the right thing! Go suck a hide bone, Val!